...when in the initial paperwork is included the reminder that "[w]e will be going to Mass every Wednesday this year." That's the kind of information you just can't see enough. Sure, it's not daily, but the beauty of it is that it means you no longer have kids who go to the school and go through Sacrament and/or religion classes and don't go to Mass because their parents won't bother to take them. Yet another step in recovering the damage associated with nearly losing an entire generation. Deo gratias!
Friday, August 29, 2008
Thursday, May 15, 2008
Two courses
First, Rich Leonardi tells us about both a beginner's and an advanced course in Latin provided by the U.K.'s National Archives. I simply must find a way to improve my sketchy-at-best Latin skills. After all, it is little use telling people of the value of Latin if I haven't remotely mastered it myself.
Second, Rorate Caeli lets us all know there is a course being offered on St. Thomas Aquinas. Ite ad Thomam has more details - it looks to be an interactive online course. I can manage to pull out both of these at nearly the same time, as well as another super-secret project I'm just getting started. Sure I can!
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
"The requisite of all culture growth is asceticism"
Father Jonathan Morris has a very interesting interview with Dr. Bernhard Beub, headmaster of the Salem boarding school in Germany and author of “Lob der Disziplin” (In Praise of Discipline). If there are more like him in Europe, its worst days may just be behind it. Without saying the word, his framework for the reform of the educational establishment in Germany is based on a very Christian principle - "to be strict, with love". A couple choice quotes (myemphasis):
Father Jonathan: When you talk about “strict education” and “discipline” what are you referring to?Tags: Catholic, Education, Discipline, Germany
Dr. Bueb: The requisite of all culture growth is asceticism … learning to postpone or renounce wishes and desires. You have to learn to work. Kids need to live a rational life, meaning to submit themselves to reason. You shouldn’t barter with your child. To a three or four-year-old boy or girl, you just say, “You have to do this or that.” People say you need to discuss everything with a child as young as possible. I am proposing finding the middle ground, a third way, to be strict with love.
...
Father Jonathan: What about the moral decline in society as a whole? Isn’t the problem bigger than just discipline in schools? Do you have a sense of why we are going in this direction?
Dr. Bueb: When a nation gets too rich, people begin to lose morals. Riches are hard to cope with. My book is now in eight languages. Germany is not the only country with the problem. Taiwan, China, and Korea, for example, are now trying to cope. When you are rich, you are seduced to enjoy life and not to work on yourself as a person. On the other hand, the poorer you are, the harder you must work to get along. Also, I think that families no longer exist in the same way as you had 50 years ago. Divorce, single mothers, we see the very negative effects in education.
Monday, September 03, 2007
Those wacky academics
Fr. Philip Powell, OP reminds us of the modus operandi of those in the dangerous academic circles and the necessity of truth (or, rather, Truth) above all. As one who worked in higher education for a few years, I will say his reflection on how issues are argued, or rather not argued, are spot on. It is amazing how much oxygen one can consume and still not say a useful thing. Do read the whole post - if nothing else it will tickle your funny bone if not, indeed, stir your mind.
Friday, August 17, 2007
Completing the circle
Denise at Catholic Mom really pushed my buttons with this post. In particular, this part is something that really gets to me:
Right now we are stuck in a cycle of poorly catechized parents that don’t support faith formation at home. Their children are in the parish CCD system where we provide a band-aid fix with classroom style religious education. These children then do their time in CCD and are sent out into the world. However, an hour a week for eight months out of the year cannot make up for a lifetime lacking in family faith formation. These children are very likely to grow up to be poorly catechized parents and the cycle begins anew. I really think the only way to break this cycle is to address the parents directly. Their lack of involvement is more out of ignorance than out of indifference. When was the last time you heard a DRE or a priest tell parents that parents are the primary catechists of their children? It is the parents’ responsibility to form the faith of their children. The parish is here to help but children learn to live the faith when their family lives the faith.I have been lamenting the complete lack of adult formation in the Church since before I even received a single sacrament. Many will, rightfully, lament how far we still have to go in catechizing our children. While I have no argument at all with the sentiment that we need to find ways other than rock concerts and rock climbing to reach our children, I'm absolutely flabbergasted at the general lack of even that level of effort to catechize our adults.
Certainly there are efforts beginning in some parishes and I absolute commend them for doing this mostly on their own. For the great work of a few, however, we cannot overlook the lack of effort of the many. My own parish has just announced a parish mission which, from what I'm told by parish "old-timers", is the first in many, many years.
Why is it that we seem to have left adults by and large to fend for themselves? I don't know. Certainly for many years there was an apathy towards any kind of substantive catechesis for anyone, an apathy whose effects we are still feeling in the uphill battle against felt banner teaching. Perhaps there was a certain cultural momentum that kept kids in CCD so they could "graduate" at Confirmation. One does have to wonder whether, for all the negatives about that phenomenon if it has not simultaneously been a primary force in keeping the catechetical system afloat. While momentum is never a good reason to move toward a sacrament, without it I have to think parishes would have had a very hard time finding teachers for CCD classes that were almost empty. Perhaps that's an example of God pulling a greater good out of a bad situation.
That momentum, however, does not seem to have existed for adults. When faith is transmitted as "God loves you and that's all there is to know" why ever would an already busy adult take time out to sit in a church basement to learn the finer nuances of the word "Abba"? With adults away from an active participation (hah! Who'd have thought I could use that term in such a way?) in their faith for so long their momentum is gone and now we have to overcome a significant inertia that has become as cultural as it is personal.
How do we overcome this inertia and generate the kind of momentum that will bring along with it those who may not have a great felt interest in their faith? I think there are two places it starts, and the first must be the pulpit. I'm not talking about flame throwing homilies or anything of the sort but rather a recognition of the fact that people respond better to invitations from clergy than those run out by a lector droning out a series of mostly-irrelevant-to-me announcements. When the priest or deacon takes time out of his homily to promote a lecture or presentation, not just to announce it but to explain why it is important to attend the result is almost invariably far greater attendance. I'm told there are even statistics for this, although I haven't the first clue of where to look for them.
If I might be so bold as to offer a piece of advice to the clergy as well - if you are not the one making the presentation, be sure to attend it if possible or at the very least stop by for more than a wave. The presence of a priest or deacon at these events adds an immeasurable weight of felt importance to those in attendance. In management (and the military) this is called "showing the flag" although we know it should have a deeper weight than that in this case. And hey, while you're there, offer a blessing, an introduction or a closing. Your personal involvement shows in another way your commitment not only to the session but to those in attendance; it shows you are actively interested in making sure they get the nourishment they need and not passively acquiescing to someone else's idea.
The second place we must overcome this inertia is, naturally, in person-to-person contact. That means not only talking to your friends but often enough your spouse. It involves not just talking about a presentation or inviting someone to one but also showing the impact of it in your life. Our response to attending a lecture or presentation should be a radiance akin to that of Moses - we need not, indeed should not, come out as a charging lion but rather show forth the loving grace of the saving Lamb. A lamp set on a stand can light a great area; we should allow those lamps to spread that light and not burn those around them.
So...with all that I'll make it simple. Do what Denise did and ask to help present on some topic that adults can relate to, something that can expand the spiritual horizons of those around you. Even if you're turned down, offer again later. We can only offer our services, we cannot impose them. No matter what, above all else, encourage and support your priest when he offers or promotes any kind of learning opportunity. In these small ways we will get this large ball rolling.
Thursday, June 07, 2007
Something more people need to hear...
Someone needs to give Dawn Eden a job. Oh, wait, they did. Even still, her words need to get out more.
What I discovered upon becoming chaste, it’s always wrong to treat people as though they are interchangeable. The thing is, any time you have sex with someone outside of marriage, you’re treating them as though they can be replaced. Because the only irreplaceable person is the person you marry.This is the kind of message they need to be pushing in all these "health" classes, not how to put condoms on bananas. As my kids would put it, Dawn rocks. Which I think would suit her to a 't'.
Tuesday, June 05, 2007
The big surprise of the day...
...Cardinal Pell doing something intelligent. From CWN:
Sydney, Jun. 4, 2007 (CWNews.com) - Cardinal George Pell of Sydney, Australia, is planning to ask Catholic-school principals to make a profession of faith, according to reports in the Australian secular media.The world needs more Bishops with backbone. I suppose the interesting question is precisely how he intends to enforce request - one hopes at the very least it has more success than Ex Corde Ecclesiae has in cleaning up Catholic colleges. I, for one, haven't seen or heard of any problems with the school my kids are in, but I'm sure there are some out there that could use some, er, cleaning. Something to keep an eye on...The call for a profession of faith is one aspect of a far-ranging pastoral plan for the Sydney archdiocese that Cardinal Pell has circulated for comments.
The principals of Catholic schools would be asked to accept a “religious submission of intellect and will” to the teachings of the Church. That phrase is taken from the Vatican II Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, and refers to the assent that is expected of all faithful Catholics.
Saturday, May 05, 2007
What goes around, comes around
I mentioned one day in our RCIA class, on the topic of suffering, that our God is a God of seeming contradictions. The way to life is hard, the way to death easy. A seed cannot produce life but that it should die. The salvation of the world required the death of the Son. In a perfectly logical, "ones and zeros" kind of world those things don't make sense. But while God is pure logic, He also transcends logic. or at least our feeble attempts at understanding it. Thus, we wind up with nuggets like this, from CNA:
Washington DC, May 4, 2007 / 01:18 pm (CNA).- Protestors gathered outside the US Supreme Court building this week to demand that the judicial body reinstate the right to pray in public places. Among those present was William “Bill” Murray, son of the late Madelyn Murray O’Hare, the militant atheist who won a 1963 court battle to prohibit prayer in public schools.The son of the woman who perpetrated a great crime is given the opportunity, and grasps hold thereof, to right the wrongs and stand up for the rights transgressed by his mother. This is a far cry from visiting the sins of a man upon his descendants for seven generations. Just when it seems most terrible, God has a twist just waiting for you.Several years ago, William Murray converted to Christianity and today he leads the Coalition for Religious Freedom. He grew up under the shadow of his mother, who won the famous court battle that removed expressions of faith from the public school system in the United States.
The Rev. Rob Schenck, who participated in the protest, said the presence of Murray was emblematic. “Nobody knows this issue like he does. He was used, abused and indoctrinated to think that prayer violated the Constitution. Now he uses the genius that God gave him to return prayer to the schools and to all public life in America,” he said.
Murray became one of the most outspoken critics of the work of his mother, who was accused of manipulating her followers, robbing funds from her organization and tax fraud. Madelyn Murray O’Hare was killed in 1995 together with her son Jon and her granddaughter Robin, William’s daughter.
Thursday, April 05, 2007
Scotland's Green Party leader wants to end parochial schools.
My, but Satan is getting feisty. It's unlike him to let his horns show so boldly. From CWN:
Apr. 5, 2007 (CWNews.com) - The leader of Scotland's Green Party, Robin Harper, has called for the abolition of Catholic schools.The existence of separate secular schools tends to divide communities as well, Mr. Harper. I live in a city with two major secular high schools and they get along, well, just like any group of high school kids who are routinely set up to compete against each other."State education should be secular," Harper said, promising that the Green Party would work to end government support for the parochial schools.
The existence of separate religious schools "tends to divide communities," Harper said. He argued that Catholics should receive their religious instruction through their parents and pastors, so that religious education in schools is unnecessary.
Now, I would love for it to be the case that his last assertion were true, but it simply is not and has not been for a long time. Quite frequently, frankly, parents simply do not have the education in their faith to be able to educate their children, and taking only an hour in CCD a week simply cannot delve into the depths of the Catholic faith. Then again, maybe that's what Mr. Harper wants.
A commenter on the story makes a very eloquent and important point. Forcing all state schools to be purely secular would be to renege on the promises of the 1916 Education Act wherein the Bishops agreed to allow all the schools to be incorporated into the state system. But then, that is how Satan is working these days - no frontal assaults. First, create a crack in the surface that seems innocuous enough. Then, wait until that change has been forgotten. Then barge through that crack at top speed screeching about diversity, inclusivity or some such drivel. Then finally portray your position as one of "human rights" and the majority of people devoid of knowledge of history succumb to the "loudest voice wins" theorem and *poof* victory is yours. Without firing a single shot. As was once said, a dictator who rules "for the good of the people" is the most tyrannical of them all.
Posted by frival at 12:49 PM | |
Labels: catholic, education, secular humanism
Monday, April 02, 2007
Don't teach history - you'll scare the kids!
The Times (UK) tells us some teachers are dropping the Holocaust and the Crusades from the curriculum to prevent offending students. What a grandiose plan. If it's not taught in school, maybe we can pretend it didn't happen, or maybe we can pretend it happened whatever way we wanted. It boggles the mind.
Teachers are dropping controversial subjects such as the Holocaust and the Crusades from history lessons because they do not want to cause offence to children from certain races or religions, a report claims.A lack of factual knowledge among some teachers, particularly in primary schools, is also leading to “shallow” lessons on emotive and difficult subjects, according to the study by the Historical Association.
So in other words, because our history teachers are already poorly trained, we're going to make sure we raise another generation that is trained even more poorly in history. Wonderful. My own generation had a woeful disdain for history class - I was the strange one that actually took an interest. (I blame my grandfather's endless chain of "when I was in The War" stories.) The story also suggests that the newest generation of children are less capable of handling their emotions than previous generations; of course, the remedy for that is to keep from dealing with those issues. Naturally.
The report, produced with funding from the Department for Education, said that where teachers and staff avoided emotive and controversial history, their motives were generally well intentioned.
The road to Hell is paved with ... oh, never mind. Women who have abortions and nuts that bomb abortion clinics are "generally well intentioned" as well. The problem here is identifying an intention with a qualitative good of an act. "But officer, I didn't mean to run over that little old lady, I was trying to not drive over the kids' hopscotch game." See? Doesn't work.
You know what? If my kids were run through public education, I'd love it if the teacher brought up the Crusades and tried to say that the Christians started it all. It would be a wonderful opportunity to teach them something they might never ask me about otherwise. Heck, I'd be delighted to go in to the class and discuss the issue with the teacher in front of the class so the students can understand how multi-faceted history is. Who knows...maybe they'd actually come to enjoy it rather than see it as nap time.“Staff may wish to avoid causing offence or appearing insensitive to individuals or groups in their classes. In particular settings, teachers of history are unwilling to challenge highly contentious or charged versions of history in which pupils are steeped at home, in their community or in a place of worship,” it concluded.
However, it was concerned that this could lead to divisions within school, and that it might also put pupils off history.Right. Because so many of the students are already taking such profuse interest in the subject. Children are looking for a challenge, an opportunity to stretch their wings. It is often said that children are like little sponges, that they absorb anything they come into contact with. If, instead, you keep the children insulated and contained they become like old unused sponges - hard and brittle. That's hardly a model to follow, wouldn't you say?
Finally, there was one comment that is just gnawing at me. This says a tremendous amount about the cultural cesspool children are growing up in today (emphasis mine):
I am a history teacher, and I must sadly admit that I hate teaching the Holocaust. It is not for fear of offending someone, but because children today (I teach 12 and 13 year-olds) can't seem to handle it. They snicker at death, laugh at suffering, guffaw at goose-stepping Nazis. They think it's all a poorly-filmed, black and white horror movie. I get tired of trying to "teach" empathy and understanding for the unfathomable human suffering...something that should be taught at home. Its so disheartening and terribly, terribly scary. (Florida72, Orlando, Florida)I'll let that one sit by itself and sink in. The raw sewage our children wade through every day is the topic for another post.
Monday, March 19, 2007
French history lesson
Gerald has posted a very in-depth commentary by F.P. Barbieri on recent and not-so-recent French history as well as a rather sweeping indictment of some of the comments by Abp. Marcel Lefebvre, founder of (F)SSPX. One reason I bring this up is that it is so fundamentally different from the view given in all the history courses I took growing up, including one called "Modern European History" whose focus was primarily on getting us to the French Revolution so that we might realize that this was the epitome of civilization. One does wonder...why, if that conclusion is so iron-clad, is any discussion of an alternative interpretation of history so quickly discouraged and roundly condemned? A surprise? I think not...
Saturday, January 13, 2007
On academics and academic freedom
Having worked for the first part of my professional career at a college, I have a little bit of an insider's view (or so I like to think) on what people in higher education are like and think. First, suffice it to say the old saying that "the battles in academia are so fierce because the stakes are so small" is entirely true. Aside from that, however, the following quote from Timothy O'Donnell's article on academic freedom in this month's Crisis magazine is something I only wish more in Catholic higher education would read and contemplate.
The university exists for one specific purpose - to help form and shape the minds of its students in their search for the acquisition of truth. In this noble effort, the cultivation of an appreciation of the good and the beautiful is also crucial, for as John Paul II stated in Ex Corde Ecclesiae, the Catholic university's goal is "to help students think rigorously, to act rightly and to serve the cause of humanity better."The article as a whole is an excellent reflection on the concept of academic freedom qua freedom. As such, it reminds us that freedom in any sense is not license, but rather ensuring the recipient has been equipped with sufficient knowledge and skills to understand how to do the right. Perhaps it is time for those in this country, indeed the rest of Western civilization, to become re-educated on exactly what true freedom is, what it entails, and what it requires. Perhaps then we could see the first steps of coming around the corner on this raggedy ride we seem to be on. One can hope.
A Catholic university's specific task is consecrated to this goal of using the light of faith and sound reason in the service of truth. In uniting these two orders, which characterize so much of what is best in the Catholic tradition - epitomized in the writings of Aquinas and many other Fathers and Doctors of the Church - there is an openness to the fullness of reality that is often lacking in the secular model of the university. Sound philosophy and theology, faithful to the roots of their disciplines, have a crucial role to play within the structure of the university community, particularly in the pursuit and preservation of academic freedom.

